There are two ways to define the greatest common divisor (also known as greatest common factor, or highest common factor), both equivalent.

The first definition is as the name suggests: the GCD of and $b$ is the largest number which divides both $a$ and $b$ .

The second definition is the more "mathematical", because it generalises to arbitrary rings rather than just ordered rings. The GCD of $a$ and $b$ is the number $c$ such that $c ∣ a$ , $c ∣ b$ , and whenever $d ∣ a$ and $d ∣ b$ , we have $d ∣ c$ . (That is, it is the maximal element of the partially ordered set that consists of the divisors of $a$ and $b$ , ordered by division.)

Examples

show the two different definitions in action and how they prepare

Equivalence of the definitions

prove this

Relation to prime factorisations

algorithm given access to prime factorisations; explain why this is unhelpful

Calculating the GCD efficiently

link to Euclidean algorithm