| v1.11.0 | (+10/-10) | |||
| v1.10.0 | (+5/-5) | |||
| v1.9.0 | (+66/-121) | |||
| v1.8.0 | (+4/-4) typo: s/team/term/ | |||
| v1.7.0 | (+296) | |||
| v1.6.0 | (-56) I don't understand what these See Alsos are doing here. | |||
| v1.5.0 | (+74/-44) | |||
| v1.4.0 | (+4/-31) byline, dashes | |||
| v1.3.0 | (+351/-40) added blog posts, descriptions of posts | |||
| v1.2.0 | (+41) |
Mainstream philosophy has a parallel procedure called "unpacking". Unpacking has the requirement that the contentious or doubtful teamterm be expanded out, and not just replaced with a synonym, but no requirement that participants in a discussion refrain from using it once uttered has been unpacked,
Mainstream philosophy has a parallel procedure called "unpacking". Unpacking has the requirement that the contentious or doubtful term be expanded out, and out--not just replaced with a synonym, but no requirement that participants insynonym--and only used as a discussion refrain from using it once uttered has been unpacked,collection of subcomponent concepts.
Mainstream philosophy has a parallel procedure called "unpacking". Unpacking has the requirement that the contentious or doubtful team be expanded out, and not just replaced with a synonym, but no requirement that participants in a discussion refrain from using it once uttered has been unpacked,
Rationalist tabooTaboo is a technique for fighting muddles in discussions. By prohibiting the use of a certain word and all the words synonymous to it, people are forced to elucidate the specific contextual meaning they want to express, thus removing ambiguity otherwise present in a single word.