Sorted by New

Wiki Contributions



I think humans doing METR's tasks are more like "expert-level" rather than average/"human-level". But current LLM agents are also far below human performance on tasks that don't require any special expertise.

From GAIA:

GAIA proposes real-world questions that require a set of fundamental abilities such as reasoning, multi-modality handling, web browsing, and generally tool-use proficiency. GAIA questions are conceptually simple for humans yet challenging for most advanced AIs: we show that human respondents obtain 92% vs. 15% for GPT-4 equipped with plugins. [Note: The latest highest AI agent score is now 39%.] This notable performance disparity contrasts with the recent trend of LLMs outperforming humans on tasks requiring professional skills in e.g. law or chemistry. GAIA's philosophy departs from the current trend in AI benchmarks suggesting to target tasks that are ever more difficult for humans. We posit that the advent of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) hinges on a system's capability to exhibit similar robustness as the average human does on such questions.

And LLMs and VLLMs seriously underperform humans in VisualWebArena, which tests for simple web-browsing capabilities:

I don't know if being able to autonomously make money should be a necessary condition to qualify as AGI. But I would feel uncomfortable calling a system AGI if it can't match human performance at simple agent tasks.


As an overly simplistic example, consider an overseer that attempts to train a cleaning robot by providing periodic feedback to the robot, based on how quickly the robot appears to clean a room; such a robot might learn that it can more quickly “clean” the room by instead sweeping messes under a rug.[15]

This doesn't seem concerning as human users would eventually discover that the robot has a tendency to sweep messes under the rug, if they ever look under the rug, and the developers would retrain the AI to resolve this issue. Can you think of an example that would be more problematic, in which the misbehavior wouldn't be obvious enough to just be trained away?

  • GPT-3, for instance, is notorious for outputting text that is impressive, but not of the desired “flavor” (e.g., outputting silly text when serious text is desired), and researchers often have to tinker with inputs considerably to yield desirable outputs.

Is this specifically referring to the base version of GPT-3 before instruction fine-tuning (davinci rather than text-davinci-002, for example)? I think it would be good to clarify that.


I first learned about the term "structural risk" in this article from 2019 by Remco Zwetsloot and Allan Dafoe, which was included in the AGI Safety Fundamentals curriculum.

To make sure these more complex and indirect effects of technology are not neglected, discussions of AI risk should complement the misuse and accident perspectives with a structural perspective. This perspective considers not only how a technological system may be misused or behave in unintended ways, but also how technology shapes the broader environment in ways that could be disruptive or harmful. For example, does it create overlap between defensive and offensive actions, thereby making it more difficult to distinguish aggressive actors from defensive ones? Does it produce dual-use capabilities that could easily diffuse? Does it lead to greater uncertainty or misunderstanding? Does it open up new trade-offs between private gain and public harm, or between the safety and performance of a system? Does it make competition appear to be more of a winner-take-all situation? We call this perspective “structural” because it focuses on what social scientists often refer to as “structure,” in contrast to the “agency” focus of the other perspectives.


Models that have been RLHF'd (so to speak), have different world priors in ways that aren't really all that intuitive (see Janus' work on mode collapse

Janus' post on mode collapse is about text-davinci-002, which was trained using supervised fine-tuning on high-quality human-written examples (FeedME), not RLHF. It's evidence that supervised fine-tuning can lead to weird output, not evidence about what RLHF does.

I haven't seen evidence that RLHF'd text-davinci-003 appears less safe compared to the imitation-based text-davinci-002.


Is the auditing game essentially Trojan detection?


Has anyone tried to work on this experimentally?


The prompt "Are birds real?" is somewhat more likely, given the "Birds aren't real" conspiracy theory, but still can yield a similarly formatted answer to "Are bugs real?"

The answer makes a lot more sense when you ask a question like "Are monsters real?" or "Are ghosts real?" It seems that with FeedMe, text-davinci-002 has been trained to respond with a template answer about how "There is no one answer to this question", and it has learned to misgeneralize this behavior to questions about real phenomena, such as "Are bugs real?"


Choosing actions which exploit known biases and blind spots in humans (as the Cicero Diplomacy agent may be doing [Bakhtin et al., 2022]) or in learned reward models. 

I've spent several hours reading dialogue involving Cicero, and it's not at all evident to me that it's "exploiting known biases and blind spots in humans". It is, however, good at proposing and negotiating plans, as well as accumulating power within the context of the game.


Thanks for writing this! Here is a quick explanation of all the math concepts – mostly written by ChatGPT with some manual edits.

A basis for a vector space is a set of linearly independent vectors that can be used to represent any vector in the space as a linear combination of those basis vectors. For example, in two-dimensional Euclidean space, the standard basis is the set of vectors (1, 0) and (0, 1), which are called the "basis vectors."

A change of basis is the process of expressing a vector in one basis in terms of another basis. For example, if we have a vector v in two-dimensional Euclidean space and we want to express it in terms of the standard basis, we can write v as a linear combination of (1, 0) and (0, 1). Alternatively, we could choose a different basis for the space, such as the basis formed by the vectors (4, 2) and (3, 5). In this case, we would express v in terms of this new basis by writing it as a linear combination of (4, 2) and (3, 5).

A vector space is a set of vectors that can be added together and multiplied ("scaled") by numbers, called scalars. Scalars are often taken to be real numbers, but there are also vector spaces with scalar multiplication by complex numbers, rational numbers, or generally any field. The operations of vector addition and scalar multiplication must satisfy certain requirements, called axioms. Examples of vector spaces include the set of all two-dimensional vectors (i.e., the set of all points in two-dimensional Euclidean space), the set of all polynomials with real coefficients, and the set of all continuous functions from a given set to the real numbers. A vector space can be thought of as a geometric object, but it does not necessarily have a canonical basis, meaning that there is not a preferred set of basis vectors that can be used to represent all the vectors in the space.

A matrix is a rectangular array of numbers, symbols, or expressions, arranged in rows and columns. A matrix is a linear map between two vector spaces, or from a vector space to itself, because it can take any vector in the original vector space and transform it into a new vector in the target vector space using a set of linear equations. Each column of the matrix represents one of the new basis vectors, which are used to define the transformation. In the expression , we take each element of the original vector and multiply it by the corresponding element in the appropriate column of the matrix, and then add these products together to create the new vector.

The singular value decomposition (SVD) is a factorization of a matrix M into the product of three matrices: , where U and V are orthogonal matrices and S is a diagonal matrix with non-negative real numbers on the diagonal, called the "singular values" of M. The SVD is a useful tool for understanding the properties of a matrix and for solving certain types of linear systems. It can also be used for data compression, image processing, and other applications.

An orthogonal matrix (or orthonormal matrix) is a square matrix whose columns and rows are mutually orthonormal (i.e., they are orthogonal and have unit length). Orthogonal matrices have the property that their inverse is equal to their transpose.

Changing to an orthonormal basis can be importantly different from just any change of basis because it has certain computational advantages. For example, when working with an orthonormal basis, the inner product of two vectors can be computed simply as the sum of the products of their corresponding components, without the need to use any weights or scaling factors. This can make certain calculations, such as finding the length of a vector or the angle between two vectors, simpler and more efficient.

Eigenvalues and eigenvectors are special types of scalars and vectors that are associated with a linear map or a matrix. If M is a linear map or matrix and v is a non-zero vector, then v is an eigenvector of M if there exists a scalar λ, called an eigenvalue, such that . In other words, when a vector is multiplied by the matrix M, the resulting vector is a scalar multiple of the original vector. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors are important because they provide insight into the properties of the linear map or matrix. For example, the eigenvalues of a matrix can tell us whether it is singular (i.e., not invertible) or whether it is diagonalizable (i.e., can be expressed in the form , where P is a matrix and D is a diagonal matrix). The eigenvectors of a matrix can also be used to determine its rank, nullity, and other characteristics.

Probability basics: Probability is a measure of the likelihood of an event occurring. It is typically represented as a number between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates that the event is impossible and 1 indicates that the event is certain to occur. The probability of an event occurring can be calculated by counting the number of ways in which the event can occur, divided by the total number of possible outcomes.

Basics of distributions: A distribution is a function that describes the probability of a random variable taking on different values. The expected value of a distribution is a measure of the center of the distribution, and it is calculated as the weighted average of the possible values of the random variable, where the weights are the probabilities of each value occurring. The standard deviation is a measure of the dispersion of the distribution, and it is calculated as the square root of the variance, which is the expected value of the squared deviation of a random variable from its mean. A normal distribution (or Gaussian distribution) is a continuous probability distribution with a bell-shaped curve, which is defined by its mean and standard deviation.

Log likelihood: The log likelihood of a statistical model is a measure of how well the model fits a given set of data. It is calculated as the logarithm of the probability of the data given the model, and it is often used to compare the relative fit of different models.

Maximum value estimators: A maximum value estimator is a statistical method that is used to estimate the value of a parameter that maximizes a given objective function. Examples of maximum value estimators include the maximum likelihood estimator and the maximum a posteriori estimator.

  • The maximum likelihood estimator is a method for estimating the parameters of a statistical model based on the principle that the parameters that maximize the likelihood of the data are the most likely to have generated the data.
  • The maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimator is a method for estimating the parameters of a statistical model based on the principle that the parameters that maximize the posterior probability of the data are the most likely to have generated the data. The posterior probability is the probability of the data given the model and the prior knowledge about the parameters. The MAP estimator is often used in Bayesian inference, and it is a popular method for estimating the parameters of a model in the presence of prior knowledge.

Random variables: A random variable is a variable whose value is determined by the outcome of a random event. For example, the toss of a coin is a random event, and the number of heads that result from a series of coin tosses is a random variable.

Central limit theorem: The central limit theorem is a statistical theorem that states that, as the sample size of a random variable increases, the distribution of the sample means approaches a normal distribution, regardless of the distribution of the underlying random variable.

Calculus basics: Calculus is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of rates of change and the accumulation of quantities. It is a fundamental tool in the study of functions and is used to model and solve problems in a variety of fields, including physics, engineering, and economics.

Gradients: In calculus, the gradient of a (scalar-valued multivariate differentiable) function is a vector that describes the direction in which the function is increasing most quickly. It is calculated as the partial derivative of the function with respect to each variable.

The chain rule: The chain rule is a fundamental rule of calculus that allows us to calculate the derivative of a composite function. It states that if f is a function of g, and g is a function of x, then the derivative of f with respect to x is equal to the derivative of f with respect to g times the derivative of g with respect to x. In tohers words, (df / dx) = (df / dg) * (dg / dx).

On backpropagation:

Backpropagation is an algorithm for training artificial neural networks, which are machine learning models inspired by the structure and function of the brain. It is used to adjust the weights and biases of the network in order to minimize the error between the predicted output and the desired output of the network.

The idea behind backpropagation is that, given a multivariate function that describes the relationships between the input variables and the output variables of a neural network, we can use the chain rule to calculate the gradient of the function with respect to the weights and biases of the network. The gradient tells us how the error changes as we adjust the weights and biases, and we can use this information to update the weights and biases in a way that reduces the error.

To understand why backpropagation is just the chain rule on multivariate functions, it's helpful to consider the structure of a neural network. A neural network consists of layers of interconnected nodes, each of which performs a calculation based on the inputs it receives from the previous layer. The output of the network is a function of the inputs, and the weights and biases of the network determine how the inputs are transformed as they pass through the layers of the network.

The process of backpropagation involves starting at the output layer of the network and working backwards through the layers, using the chain rule to calculate the gradients of the weights and biases at each layer. This is done by calculating the derivative of the error with respect to the output of each layer, and then using the chain rule to propagate these derivatives back through the layers of the network. This allows us to calculate the gradients of the weights and biases at each layer, which we can use to update the weights and biases in a way that minimizes the error.

Overall, backpropagation is an efficient and effective way to train neural networks because it allows us to calculate the gradients of the weights and biases efficiently, using the chain rule to propagate the derivatives through the layers of the network. This enables us to adjust the weights and biases in a way that minimizes the error, which is essential for the effective operation of the network.

Load More