For the last few years, the Annual Review has followed the same three-stage template: 1. A couple of weeks of nominating posts for consideration in the review. 2. A month of writing reviews and critiques of posts. 3. Two final weeks voting on which posts were ultimately most valuable.
Here's a table of all the posts by year that were part of this process.
For the last few years, the Annual Review has followed the same three-stage template: 1. A couple of weeks of nominating posts for consideration in the review. 2. A month of writing reviews and critiques of posts. 3. Two final weeks voting on which posts were ultimately most valuable.
For the last few years, the Annual Review has followed the same three-stage template: 1. A couple of weeks of nominating posts for consideration in the review. 2. A month of writing reviews and critiques of posts. 3. Two final weeks voting on which posts were ultimately most valuable.
For the last few years, the Annual Review has followed the same three-stage template: 1. A couple of weeks of nominating posts for consideration in the review. 2. A month of writing reviews and critiques of posts. 3. Two final weeks voting on which posts were ultimately most valuable.
For the last few years, the Annual Review has followed the same three-stage template: 1. A couple of weeks of nominating posts for consideration in the review. 2. A month of writing reviews and critiques of posts. 3. Two final weeks voting on which posts were ultimately most valuable.