Intelligence Without Sovereignty: A Non-Executive Architecture for ASI

Edited by Gyrodiot last updated 9th Aug 2020

AI Governance asks how we can ensure society benefits at large from increasingly powerful AI systems. While solving technical AI alignment is a necessary step towards this goal, it is by no means sufficient.

Governance includes policy, economics, sociology, law, and many other fields.

Posts tagged Intelligence Without Sovereignty: A Non-Executive Architecture for ASI

7

20ControlAI 2025 Impact Report: our progress toward an international ban on ASI

Andrea_Miotti, Alex Amadori

6mo

0

3

26Compute Thresholds: proposed rules to mitigate risk of a “lab leak” accident during AI training runs

davidad

3y

2

1

35Preventing extinction from ASI on a $50M yearly budget

Andrea_Miotti, Alex Amadori, Gabriel Alfour

5mo

13

2

39Soft takeoff can still lead to decisive strategic advantage

Daniel Kokotajlo

7y

34

1

12Actionable-guidance and roadmap recommendations for the NIST AI Risk Management Framework

Dan H, Tony Barrett

4y

0

2

143AI 2040: Plan A

Daniel Kokotajlo, elifland, Thomas Larsen, romeo, brendanhalstead, ryan_greenblatt

2mo

21

1

135Statement on AI Extinction - Signed by AGI Labs, Top Academics, and Many Other Notable Figures

Dan H

3y

12

1

47The current bottleneck is political will, not research

Charbel-Raphaël

2mo

8

1

103Thoughts on responsible scaling policies and regulation

paulfchristiano

3y

24

1

75What does it take to defend the world against out-of-control AGIs?

Steven Byrnes

4y

35

2

48Many arguments for AI x-risk are wrong

TurnTrout

3y

55

2

65On the Rationality of Deterring ASI

Dan H

2y

3

2

71AI companies are unlikely to make high-assurance safety cases if timelines are short

ryan_greenblatt

2y

4

1

49Ngo and Yudkowsky on AI capability gains

Eliezer Yudkowsky, Richard_Ngo

5y

46

1

38Cyborg Periods: There will be multiple AI transitions

Jan_Kulveit, rosehadshar

4y

2